Most rental agreements typically outline restrictions such as subletting or illegal activities, but the notion of landlords banning tenants from working from home is becoming more prevalent. A recent tweet by @HarleyShah showcased a property listing with a monthly rent of £1,300, despite having a desk, stating 'no working from home allowed'. This trend is not isolated, as numerous ads on Spareroom in London feature 'no WFH' prominently. Some landlords are demanding over £1,000 a month for a room shared with other tenants, with restrictions on remote work. The backlash on social media has been palpable, with users criticizing these anti-WFH rules as unreasonable. However, legal experts confirm that landlords have the right to impose such regulations or charge extra for shared facilities, even if it appears unjust. Shelter's legal team clarifies that while these restrictions may seem unfair, they are not considered illegal under the Consumer Rights Act 2015. The situation becomes more complicated when renters engage in business activities on the premises, which is typically prohibited in tenancy agreements. Landlords also have varying rights to evict tenants based on residency status within the property. The lack of affordable housing options exacerbates the challenges faced by renters in the UK, with the chief executive of Shelter advocating for stronger tenant protections and increased social housing. In the short term, prospective tenants are advised to thoroughly review rental agreements to ensure compatibility with their needs, to avoid potential conflicts with landlords down the line.