In a recent report, the Work Foundation has highlighted the worsening long-term illness crisis in Britain, exacerbated by unequal access to statutory sick pay. Women, disabled, and young workers are particularly affected, as they are less likely to earn enough to qualify for SSP. The think tank is calling for urgent action from the next government, estimating that over a million workers are unable to meet the threshold and may feel pressured to work while ill.
The report points out that 47% of employers only offer the minimum SSP rate, further aggravating the situation. With a record 2.83 million people economically inactive due to long-term health issues, the Work Foundation warns of a 'vicious cycle' where higher earners are more likely to take time off than lower-paid workers.
Currently, workers need to earn over £123 a week to access SSP of £96.75 for up to 28 weeks. However, many face challenges in claiming SSP as it only applies after three days of illness and is based on scheduled work days. Those on zero-hours contracts are especially disadvantaged, as they often receive shifts with short notice.
The think tank proposes reforms to SSP, including removing the lower earnings limit, starting payments from the first day of illness, and increasing the rate to 60% of usual wages. It also suggests a government rebate to assist smaller employers in providing sick pay.
While the Labour party has not committed to raising the weekly amount, they have pledged to eliminate the three unpaid waiting days. The TUC general secretary has condemned the current situation, emphasizing that every worker should have access to SSP. The Commons' work and pensions committee has previously criticized the inadequacy of SSP, calling for improvements to support the workforce and public health.