Home Back

Honda 1.5L Vs. 2.4L Engine: Which Is Better If You're Buying A Used CR-V?

Slashgear 2024/10/5

Performance and efficiency

There's a reason that turbocharged engines are showing up more and more under the hood of modern vehicles: automakers can craft a smaller engine but still include robust performance. The 2017 CR-V with a 1.5L Single-Scroll MHI TD03 Turbo generates a respectable 190 horsepower as opposed to the 2.4L that produces 184 horses. One expert reviewer explained, "The CR-V [turbo variant] is quicker than most competitors, providing good low-end oomph for scooting through city streets."

However, another outlet described the naturally aspirated option as "a smooth and peppy 2.4-liter inline-four," but did note the turbo option was faster. But if you plan to tow anything with your CR-V, the larger 2.4L engine would be a better choice than the smaller turbocharged option.

In terms of fuel efficiency, the smaller turbocharged CR-V wins, but not by as much as you might think. The EX, EX-L, and Touring trims that include turbo offer a combined EPA estimated 30 mpg. The larger non-turbo engine configuration is rated for a combined EPA figure of 28 mpg, a difference of only two. No matter which CR-V model you choose, it's wise to incorporate the best ways to use less gas while driving for optimal fuel economy.

People are also reading