Kenneth Okonkwo argues that keeping him has not improved the security situation in the southeast. Instead, the prolonged detention has worsened the crisis without resolving it. Addressing this complex issue requires a more nuanced approach, as the current strategy seems ineffective.
Kenneth Okonkwo highlights a crucial point: "keeping him in custody has not solved the security situation in the southeast. Instead, it has given rise to new challenges. The rise of "unknown gunmen" exemplifies how the situation has become more unpredictable and difficult to manage. This unpredictable nature of the crisis indicates that the current methods may be inadequate. "It has not stopped the agitation. As a matter of fact, it is making even the agitation to now be multifaceted, to now be unknown. That's why you hear of the unknown gunmen. So it's more difficult to tackle. Releasing him, in my opinion, will be better now than keeping him," says Kenneth Okonkwo.
Okonkwo contends that the advantages of setting him free are greater than the drawbacks. He proposes that engaging in negotiations and identifying the optimal release strategy could result in a more controllable scenario. "The benefit of releasing him will be better than the cost. So you negotiate with him, know the best option, and release him," he asserts.
Kenneth Okonkwo's statement underscores the complex security challenges in the southeast, emphasizing that the current strategies have not effectively addressed the situation. He suggests that a different approach may be necessary, noting that his release could potentially contribute to stability and security in the region. This highlights ongoing discussions about the best ways to manage security issues and respond to various forms of agitation.
Please watch the video below and fast forward to:07:01