Gabriel Oguda's statement reflects a deep sense of frustration and bewilderment at what he perceives as unwarranted aggression from President William Ruto's administration. The tone is a mix of defiance, sarcasm, and genuine confusion, highlighting the tension between the government and its critics in Kenya.
The reference to police breaking his gate "at ungodly hours" suggests a raid or an attempt to intimidate Oguda. Such actions, if true, raise serious concerns about press freedom and the treatment of dissenting voices in Kenya. Oguda, known for his outspoken commentary on Kenyan politics and social issues, seems to be implying that this incident is a direct result of his criticism of the Ruto administration.
The mention of Ruto's chicken is particularly interesting. It's a sarcastic jab that plays on the President's well-known background as a chicken seller before his rise to political prominence. By asking if he has eaten any of Ruto's chicken to justify the violence against him, Oguda is effectively saying that he can't think of any legitimate reason for such treatment. It's a clever way of questioning the motives behind the alleged raid while also reminding the public of Ruto's humble beginnings.
The phrase "aachane na mimi" is Swahili for "leave me alone" or "let go of me." Its use here emphasizes Oguda's desire to be left in peace and suggests that he feels unfairly targeted or harassed. The offer to repay Ruto if he has indeed eaten his chicken is clearly not meant literally, but rather serves to underscore the absurdity of the situation as Oguda sees it.
This incident, if confirmed, would fit into a broader pattern of concern about the shrinking space for free expression and critique in Kenya. Journalists, activists, and opposition figures have often complained about intimidation tactics used to silence them. Oguda's statement, therefore, is not just about his personal experience but also speaks to wider issues of democracy and human rights in the country.
The use of social media to air these grievances is significant. Platforms like Twitter have become crucial tools for activists and journalists to quickly disseminate information and rally support. By making this statement public, Oguda is not only expressing his frustration but also potentially protecting himself by ensuring that many people are aware of his situation.